Unfortunately since the dawn of time, and up to current day society, arms has been an immutable part of society. Until a miraculous force descends from the sky to obliterate the need for arms, the EAT will apply the morally facing, practical, and empirically striving sequence stated below called the Inevitability of Arms (IOA) Principle.
- Necessity of Representation
- Necessity of Allegiance
- Necessity of Leadership
- Necessity of Posture
- Necessity of Accreditation
- Necessity of Standardization
- Necessity of Adjudication
These are the necessities that comprise the Inevitability of Arms (IOA) Principle. Any moral discussion at arms must include these considerations. They must be upheld throughout all decision making processes to ensure all moral obligations are met. A truly elegant arms assembly will retain these facts as foundational principles. Perhaps even apply the IOA as a set of root level protocols.
NECESSITY OF REPRESENTATION
All must have representation at arms. Since the dawn of civilization proper representation has improved the odds of survival. ‘Survival of the represented’ is a tangible and quantifiable fact. Self representation via individuals or groups are common. Acquired representation such as public or private arms are regarded as the industrial norm.
NECESSITY OF ALLEGIANCE
People form allegiances to maintain representation at arms. Especially for
essential aspects of their lives. Allegiances can be outwardly specified or experienced via subtle modes of conduct. Agreements are usually made for vital aspects of one’s societal lifestyle. This includes social control mechanisms such as money, arms, and even sex. In a world of arms, numbers are a major factor in deciding outcomes. The people who survive often form strong allegiances. As of the writing of this document Jan 2024, the conduct of society coerces people to support and commit to an arms ideology. These range from personally decided core commitments to forced commitments. Uniformity of arms conveys its allegiance along with its strength.
NECESSITY OF LEADERSHIP
People have to lead, especially at arms. Leadership backed by empirically sound objectives and methods tend to survive the test of time. Obviously, improper actions and decisions will only compromise arms of the wielder, and potentially the arms that roof them.
Quite simply put, there is no such thing as anyone doing what they want, to anyone they want, without eventually meeting severe consequences. Those who operate with such recklessness have not performed any such activities in the sight of an empirical arm. Consequently, they are usually hunted by empirical arms.
NECESSITY OF POSTURE
People have a natural right to protect their safety and any rightfully earned possessions. The Protocols Of Equal makes this clear with the Right of Equal Enforcement principle. Usually, posture acts as a natural deterrent by preventing potential aggression. In a world significantly influenced by arms, capable posture is not only a human right of every individual, it’s a necessity.
NECESSITY OF ACCREDITATION
There are substantial quantities of arms, and they must be accounted for. Ideologies and actions of individuals or groups must be truthfully accredited. Whether moral or immoral. Leading figures should be accredited and must absorb some responsibility for whom they represent. Ground Level Arms should have representation at High Level Arms. Consistent generational hierarchy must be maintained to ensure an accredited lineage of accountability. Time often becomes the stage to indemnify or persecute one from transgressions. Careful thought should be applied when accrediting arms as the effects are multi-generational.
NECESSITY OF STANDARDIZATION
In a world of subjective pursuits and actions, common core values must be developed empirically and elevated to a point of absolute adherence. This includes best practices across the entire spectrum of arms. It’s essential for reliable arms standards to be delivered by education frameworks. Throughout history this has been the missing component. However, Elegant Arms Theory is here to empower and oversee a history making set of arms standardizations.
NECESSITY OF ADJUDICATION
If common core values are infringed upon, there must be an adjudicate assembly to oversee the matter. Evidently, a morally proven adjudicate ideology must preside over such an assembly to ensure the preservation of common core values. This requires articulated and thoroughly researched empirical methods. They must be adequately iterated through all aspects of socioeconomic architecture. This complex oversight is necessary to ensure any adjudication at arms is congruent with common core values for all parties involved. This includes an equated calculation from the demarcation point to the point of sentencing.
No responses yet